Close X

Rhode Island Bar Journal Article

First Circuit Protects Citizens Recording Police

Posted by Keith G. Langer | Dec 28, 2020 | 0 Comments

 
 
The First Circuit struck down that portion of the MA wiretap statute which forbids recording police acting in their official capacity, ruling that portion of the MA wiretap statute is unconstitutional:
 
“,[W]e conclude that the statute's outright ban on such secret recording is not narrowly tailored to further the government's important interest in preventing interference with police doing their jobs and thereby protecting the public,” Judge David J. Barron wrote for the panel, applying the intermediate scrutiny test for content-neutral speech restrictions."
 
"Adam Schwartz of San Francisco, who co-authored an amicus brief on behalf of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the decision ensures people can effectively use their phones to document police misconduct without fear that police will punish them if they announce they are recording.
 
“Police have taken people's phones and broken them or arrested people who record,” said Schwartz, a senior staff attorney with EFF. “But as the opinion unanimously says, if the rule is that you can't record the police unless you announce to them you are recording, the result is that there will be no recording.”
 
Murat Erkan, a criminal defense attorney in Andover who was not involved in the case, called any government policy criminalizing police accountability 'disturbing' in light of overwhelming evidence of pretextual police stops, racial profiling, and police brutality against people of color.
 
The 1st Circuit's ruling, however, fortifies the basic right to transparency, he said.
 
'The legalization of covertly recording police officers in public areas is not an attack on the police profession; it is a bulwark of liberty. And I hope, with this ruling, perhaps more officers will act as if someone is watching.'”
 
This story comes from the 12/28/20 MA Lawyers Weekly; the opinion is:
 
Project Veritas Action Fund v. Rollins; Martin, et al. v. Rollins

About the Author

Keith G. Langer

Keith G. Langer, Attorney at Law SERVING NORFOLK COUNTY, MA, AND SURROUNDING AREAS Solo practitioner concentrating in civil litigation, collections, family law and administrative law, particularly firearms licensing.Professional Qualifications: One of the longest-serving member of the Firear...

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Your Time May Be Limited!

If you are a defendant in a civil suit, you have a specific period of time in which to file an answer. Failure to do so can result in a default judgment being issued against you. Failure to timely submit responses to discovery requests can also negatively affect your case. Those named as defendants in criminal cases via clerk magistrate or “show cause” hearings must appear, or the complaint will issue against them. Those seeking to appeal a negative action, such as a firearms license denial or revocation, denial of a permit, or losing a case at trial, all have specific time periods in which to act. Do not lose your rights by inertia or delay.

Act Now!

The law is an area in which inertia can have very negative consequences: The loss of rights and remedies. It is unlikely that your problem will just “go away” - act now to protect yourself and preserve your options.