Close X

Rhode Island Bar Journal Article

EOPSS Reasoning Rejected for the 12th Consecutive Time

Posted by Keith Langer | Jan 28, 2019 | 0 Comments

EOPSS Is Now 0 for 12.

The Greenfield District Court just issued the twelfth, consecutive rejection of the rationalization asserted by EOPSS, a bureaucracy with no licensing authority, advising chiefs to revoke existing firearms licenses. As with the five other courts providing a detailed analysis, this court noted the decision of the New Hampshire Supreme Court, which rejected EOPSS' reasoning three years before EOPSS issued its missive:

"This court finds the New Hampshire Supreme Court's logic in Dupont v. Nashua Police Department and Dupont v. McDonough et al. NH 2013-0513, 2014-017, 113 A.3d 239 (2015) persuasive in this case. The Petitioner's misdemeanor conviction over thirty years ago does not preclude him from retaining a Firearms Identification Card and it does not preclude the licensing authority in the Town of Sunderland from renewing and issuing a Firearms Identification Card to the Petitioner at present.

Furthermore, this court specifically finds that Petitioner fully restored his civil right to possess a firearm in Massachusetts through a favorable Board decision and therefore the law entitles him to his Firearms Identification Card. As a result the Petitioner is not disqualified by Federal Law from possessing a firearm."

(Bold added).

The chief's decision was overturned.

About the Author

Keith Langer

Keith G. Langer, Attorney at Law SERVING NORFOLK COUNTY, MA, AND SURROUNDING AREAS Solo practitioner concentrating in civil litigation, collections, family law and administrative law, particularly firearms licensing.Professional Qualifications: One of the longest-serving member of the Firear...

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Your Time May Be Limited!

If you are a defendant in a civil suit, you have a specific period of time in which to file an answer. Failure to do so can result in a default judgment being issued against you. Failure to timely submit responses to discovery requests can also negatively affect your case. Those named as defendants in criminal cases via clerk magistrate or “show cause” hearings must appear, or the complaint will issue against them. Those seeking to appeal a negative action, such as a firearms license denial or revocation, denial of a permit, or losing a case at trial, all have specific time periods in which to act. Do not lose your rights by inertia or delay.

Act Now!

The law is an area in which inertia can have very negative consequences: The loss of rights and remedies. It is unlikely that your problem will just “go away” - act now to protect yourself and preserve your options.