Close X

Rhode Island Bar Journal Article

Annie Dookhan, Redux:

Posted by Keith G. Langer | Sep 26, 2019 | 0 Comments

On April 18, 2017, Massachusetts dropped more than 21,000 low-level drug criminal charges involving state lab tech Annie Dookhan. Out of the 15,570 cases involved in her work only about 115 were pursued.

Now, less than a year and a half later, we have the same scenario with Sonja Farak. Per the latest MA Lawyers Weekly, the Special Master appointed to this fiasco reports dismissals of more than 16,000 drug cases:

"By: Kris Olson September 26, 2019

Culminating work that had begun when he was appointed special master by the Supreme Judicial Court on Feb. 28, 2018, retired Appeals Court Judge Judd J. Carhart reported on Sept. 23 that 24,295 charges in more than 16,000 cases had been dismissed due to the misconduct of former state drug lab chemist Sonja Farak.

After initially ordering the dismissal with prejudice of all cases in which Farak had signed the certificate of analysis, the SJC later enlarged the class of defendants entitled to relief due to Farak's misconduct to include defendants who had pleaded guilty to a drug charge, had admitted to sufficient facts on a drug charge, or had been found guilty of a drug charge where the conviction was based on methamphetamine and the drugs were tested during Farak's tenure at the Amherst lab, or the drugs were tested at the Amherst lab on or after Jan. 1, 2009, and through Jan. 18, 2013, regardless of who signed the certificate of analysis."

 
 
 
 

About the Author

Keith G. Langer

Keith G. Langer, Attorney at Law SERVING NORFOLK COUNTY, MA, AND SURROUNDING AREAS Solo practitioner concentrating in civil litigation, collections, family law and administrative law, particularly firearms licensing.Professional Qualifications: One of the longest-serving member of the Firear...

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Your Time May Be Limited!

If you are a defendant in a civil suit, you have a specific period of time in which to file an answer. Failure to do so can result in a default judgment being issued against you. Failure to timely submit responses to discovery requests can also negatively affect your case. Those named as defendants in criminal cases via clerk magistrate or “show cause” hearings must appear, or the complaint will issue against them. Those seeking to appeal a negative action, such as a firearms license denial or revocation, denial of a permit, or losing a case at trial, all have specific time periods in which to act. Do not lose your rights by inertia or delay.

Act Now!

The law is an area in which inertia can have very negative consequences: The loss of rights and remedies. It is unlikely that your problem will just “go away” - act now to protect yourself and preserve your options.